Browse routes by region
The tables below show representative countries, cities, and connection types. They do not display latency, load, online user counts, or real-time bandwidth. Connection performance depends on the local network, carrier gateway, destination service, and time of use.
Asia-Pacific routes
Suitable for services in East, Southeast, and South Asia. Shorter network paths are generally useful for everyday browsing, collaboration tools, and regional content.
| Country / region | City | Connection type | Streaming support |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hong Kong | Hong Kong | IEPL | Supported |
| Japan | Tokyo | IEPL | Supported |
| Japan | Osaka | Relay | Supported |
| Singapore | Singapore | IEPL | Supported |
| South Korea | Seoul | Relay | Supported |
| Malaysia | Kuala Lumpur | Direct | Partially supported |
| Thailand | Bangkok | Direct | Partially supported |
| India | Mumbai | Relay | Partially supported |
North America routes
Suitable for North American websites, cloud workspaces, developer platforms, and streaming services. When the destination is on a different coast, test cities on both the West and East Coasts.
| Country / region | City | Connection type | Streaming support |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | Los Angeles | IEPL | Supported |
| United States | San Jose | Relay | Supported |
| United States | New York | Direct | Supported |
| Canada | Vancouver | Relay | Supported |
| Canada | Toronto | Direct | Partially supported |
Europe routes
Covers major network hubs across Western and Central Europe, suitable for European content, remote work systems, research databases, and business services for local users.
| Country / region | City | Connection type | Streaming support |
|---|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | London | Relay | Supported |
| Germany | Frankfurt | IEPL | Supported |
| France | Paris | Relay | Supported |
| Netherlands | Amsterdam | Direct | Partially supported |
| Switzerland | Zurich | Relay | Partially supported |
| Italy | Milan | Direct | Partially supported |
| Spain | Madrid | Direct | Partially supported |
Routes in other regions
For services in Oceania, the Middle East, South America, and Africa. For long-distance routes, judge performance by whether the actual task is completed successfully.
| Country / region | City | Connection type | Streaming support |
|---|---|---|---|
| Australia | Sydney | Relay | Supported |
| United Arab Emirates | Dubai | Direct | Partially supported |
| Brazil | São Paulo | Direct | Partially supported |
| South Africa | Johannesburg | Direct | Partially supported |
International connection types
IEPL, relay, and direct connections are not simply higher or lower tiers. They use different network paths, cost structures, and operating environments, so choose based on the task first and local connection results second.
IEPL
IEPL focuses on controllable cross-region connectivity. After data enters through the local connection, it follows a specially planned transport path before reaching external services through an exit in the destination region. Compared with ordinary public-network paths, it reduces unpredictable intermediate segments and is better suited to tasks that require connection continuity, responsive interaction, and stable transfers.
Typical use cases include remote work, online meetings, cloud development environments, continuous synchronization, and long-running data transfers. Construction and maintenance usually cost more than other options, so providers tend to allocate these resources to regions where a stable path matters most. An IEPL label does not guarantee the same experience for every user; local access quality still affects the final result.
Relay connections
A relay connection first reaches a selected entry point, then uses a relay path to reach the destination region. Relays help avoid underperforming public-network segments between the local network and the remote destination while directing traffic from different carriers onto a more suitable onward path. This balances coverage, cost, and connection performance.
Relays suit everyday browsing, streaming, AI tools, and most office tasks. The entry and exit points are not necessarily in the same place, so judging a route only by its exit city is incomplete. If both IEPL and relay options are available in the same region, test the relay first; when long connections, uploads, or meetings fluctuate noticeably, switch to IEPL for comparison.
Direct connections
A direct connection travels from the local network through the public internet to an exit in the destination region. Its path is relatively simple and can cover more countries and cities. It does not rely on additional relay resources, making it suitable for validating access to a specific region, temporarily changing the exit location, or using a route where the local carrier path performs well.
Direct connections are more affected by inter-carrier routing, long-distance transmission, and changes in usage time. They are not inherently slow or necessarily unstable; when the public-network path between the local network and destination is suitable, a direct connection can perform very smoothly. Judge it by continuity while loading pages, submitting tasks, and maintaining long connections—not by the route name alone.
| Comparison | IEPL | Relay | Direct |
|---|---|---|---|
| Path structure | A specially planned cross-region transport path | A combination of entry point, relay, and destination-region exit | Directly connects to the destination region through the public internet |
| Best for | Meetings, development, synchronization, continuous transfers | Browsing, streaming, AI tools, routine office work | Regional verification, temporary access, backup switching |
| Cost structure | Higher construction and maintenance costs | Balances coverage and resource costs | Relatively straightforward resource structure |
| What to prioritize | Long connections and task continuity | Overall experience and destination fit | The local carrier’s public-network path |
Choose a route by use case
Choose routes around the task you actually need to complete. A shorter distance, prominent name, or higher-tier connection type alone cannot determine the final experience. Identify the destination first, then compare candidate routes using the same actions.
Everyday browsing
Start with a nearby Asia-Pacific relay or direct route, then continuously open familiar websites, search pages, and reference sites. Focus on whether pages respond smoothly and images and documents load consistently. If a nearby route performs poorly on the current network, try another connection type in the same region instead of repeatedly reconnecting to the same route.
Streaming
Choose an exit in the region where the content is available, then check the account region and platform catalog. After starting a video, test playback startup, seeking, and continuous playback rather than only confirming that the homepage loads. Streaming platforms adjust regional recognition policies, and routes in the same city may differ, so keep alternatives in the same region.
AI tools
AI tools often involve login, conversations, file uploads, and continuous output. Consider a relay or IEPL route in a region commonly used by the target service, then complete a conversation and file operation. If the page opens but output stops, compare connection stability first and also confirm the account region and the service’s own usage policies.
Online gaming
For gaming, prioritize the server region, routing stability, and packet loss. Choose a route near the game server and verify response in a real match or training session. Fast downloads do not guarantee a stable match; if the connection fluctuates, compare IEPL and relay routes in the same region instead of frequently switching between regions.
Remote work
Meetings, code repositories, online documents, and cloud workspaces depend on sustained connectivity. Use IEPL first for joining meetings, screen sharing, uploading, and saving files, then keep a relay as a backup. Unlimited devices can reduce account-switching steps when sharing across a team, but each device should still be tested separately on its local network.
Data transfers
Use the same set of files for uploads, synchronization, and downloads to avoid misleading results caused by different sources. Continuous transfers are better suited to IEPL or a stable relay route. If the task requires access to storage in a specific region, match the route to that region and perform a small-scale test before the full transfer.
Choose routes by completing real tasks
Opening a webpage once does not show whether a route suits every scenario. A more reliable method is to keep the device, local network, and task fixed, then compare candidate routes one by one.
Identify the destination region first
Content platforms, office systems, AI tools, and game servers may be located in different regions. Confirm the target service’s main region first, then start testing with nearby cities. If the account is tied to a region, keep the exit region reasonably consistent with the account’s usage environment.
Compare using the same actions
For browsing, use the same set of pages; for streaming, use the same content; for work, complete the same meeting and upload process. Only consistent test tasks make route differences meaningful. Do not directly compare results from different websites, file sources, or usage periods.
Observe the complete process
A route may open pages normally in a short test but fluctuate during continuous output, video seeking, file synchronization, or screen sharing. Cover the beginning, interaction, and completion of the task, paying attention to whether you need to refresh, log in again, or resubmit.
Keep alternative routes available
Carrier routing and platform policies can change. Keeping different connection types for commonly used regions allows you to switch quickly when conditions change. A backup route does not need to use the same type as the primary route; combining IEPL, relay, and direct connections can make troubleshooting clearer.
Global coverage and usage boundaries
VPNJV provides 120+ countries and 210+ routes. The coverage count indicates the range of available regions; it does not mean every country has the same connection types or that every destination platform will produce the same results at all times.
Coverage count and representative locations
The table on this page shows common regions and typical routes; it does not reproduce every item in the client line by line on a marketing page. Route maintenance, exit changes, and regional resource updates appear in the subscription content after login. For less commonly used regions, search for the country or city in the client.
The same city may offer IEPL, relay, and direct connections at the same time, or only one of them. The same server location does not mean the same data path. Check both the region and connection type when choosing a route, then confirm the fit for your current network through a real task.
Platform support and device use
This service supports Windows / macOS / iOS / Android / Linux, with no device limit for simultaneous connections. After logging in to the user panel, obtain the client and subscription, then choose routes in the same or different regions across devices. Device sharing does not change the network conditions of an individual route; large parallel tasks should still be planned around the plan’s traffic allowance and actual use.
No email address is required for registration; a username and password are enough. Payment methods include Alipay / WeChat Pay / USDT, and the service includes a 14-day no-questions-asked refund. See the plans page for the listed monthly subscriptions and data packages.